Ponte Academic Journal Aug 2020, Volume 76, Issue 8 |
SELF-EFFICACY AND DECISION MAKING OF HOCKEY REFEREES Author(s): Nursen Sahin ,F. Pervin Bilir, Ali Yıldırım J. Ponte - Aug 2020 - Volume 76 - Issue 8 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2020.8.11 Abstract: In this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and decision making styles of hockey referees. Study design was descriptive and relational. The sample of the study consisted of totally 94 hockey referees, 25 women and 69 men, who participated in the 2019-2020 hall season development seminar held in Antalya-Alanya. Referee Self Efficacy Scale developed by Myers et al. (2012), adapted by Karacam and Pulur (2017) and Melbourne Decision Making Scale developed by Mann et al. (1998) and adopted by Deniz (2004) were used as data collection tools. It was determined that the data did not show normal distribution. For this reason, Spearman\'s rho correlation test, which is one of the non-parametric tests, was used. Descriptive statistics were also used. In the study, it was determined that hockey referees had a high level of self-esteem and careful decision making style in each factor of their self-efficacy and decision making. It was seen that there was a relationship with referees\' self-efficacy decision making and self-esteem dimension in decision making, whereas pressure and communication self-efficacy was also related to careful decision making style. As a result, it can be said that there is a positive relationship between hockey referees\' self-esteem and careful decision making style in terms of self-efficacy and decision making.\r\n
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |